[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?)
- Subject: Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?)
- From: davidf(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 07:46:59 -0700
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
- References: <36360903.2E93AFD0@surromed.com> <MPG.109fbf7097dfc4019896e2@news.frii.com> <363729C1.2A3014B1@io.harvard.edu>
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:12541
Note: A copy of this article was e-mailed to the original poster.
Martin Schultz (mgs@io.harvard.edu) writes:
> Hi David,
>
> does this mean they'll introduce a new TYPE value and shift
> strings, structures, pointers, etc. one up? "Oh jemineh !" (german) that
> would mean a lot of rewriting ...
Nein. The new unsigned (16-bit) integer is type 12, followed
by the 32-bit unsigned integer as type 13. Then the 64-bit
integer at 14, with the new 64-bit unsigned integer as type 15.
Wow! 15 data types. Can't say RSI isn't listening to
someone! :-)
Cheers,
David
----------------------------------------------------------
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Phone: 970-221-0438, Toll-Free Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/