[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux vs Win95
- Subject: Re: Linux vs Win95
- From: Karsten Rodenacker <rodena(at)gsf.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:32:29 +0100
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: GSF Forschungszentrum fuer Umwelt und Gesundheit
- References: <364FF491.27ECA60@ensam.inra.fr> <36512254.410751679@news.tu-graz.ac.at> <Amara.Graps-1711981745290001@mppp1.mpi-hd.mpg.de>
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:12975
The thread has turned to emacs vs idlde.
I'm also using (x)emacs on unix and idlde on NT, however I prefer xemacs
(and the development under unix). Idl under the latter behaves IMHO more
reasonable.
Still I would appreciate to get some improvements of idl.el and
idl-shell.el e.g. the color-coding of user and inbuilt procedures and a
key for 'widget_control,/reset&heap_gc&close,/all&retall'.
--
Karsten Rodenacker
-------------------------------------------------------------------------:-)
GSF - Forschungszentrum Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry
D-85758 Oberschleissheim Postfach 11 29
Tel: +49 (0)89 3187 3401 | FAX: ...3369 | MAILTO:rodena@gsf.de
http://www.gsf.de/institute/ibb/Rodenacker/