[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*Subject*: Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)*From*: ushomirs(at)my-deja.com*Date*: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:09:19 GMT*Newsgroups*: comp.lang.idl-pvwave*Organization*: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.*References*: <7r90g4$rqb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37D82EA9.BA62A369@wellesley.edu> <7r9jbl$aem$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37DCCE9A.F1AC4BF1@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <MPG.1246a891f3c895e19898eb@news.frii.com> <37DE1600.5E99BDE4@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <MPG.124804e8864d03df9898ec@news.frii.com> <7rq9gg$f14$2@alster.dkrz.de> <MPG.124ad31447ec3ccd9898f7@news.frii.com>*Xref*: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:16601

In article <MPG.124ad31447ec3ccd9898f7@news.frii.com>, davidf@dfanning.com (David Fanning) wrote: > New in IDL 5.3 (according to the on-line documentation in the beta > version is a "compile option" routine that can change the default > integer size from 16-bit to 32-bit: > > IDL> Compile_Opt DefInt32 > IDL> a = 0 > IDL> Help, a > A LONG = 0 > > Cheers, > > David > > P.S. Note there is NO comma after the COMPILE_OPT > command! Took me about 10 minutes to realize that. :-( see! that's yet another example of how poorly thought out IDL is!! other directives (such as .RUN, .COMPILE) don't need a comma after their names. Why not make it .COMPILE_OPT, so that the lack of comma would at least make sense? I guess that would be too reasonable and well thought-out for RSI.. sigh.. greg Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)***From:*David Fanning

**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)***From:*Mirko Vukovic

**References**:**ODEPACK***From:*ushomirs

**a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*Richard G. French

**Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*ushomirs

**Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*FIT

**Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*David Fanning

**Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*FIT

**Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines***From:*David Fanning

**Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)***From:*Martin.Schultz@dkrz.de

**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)***From:*David Fanning

- Prev by Date:
**Re: passing structures to CALL_EXTERNAL** - Next by Date:
**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)** - Next by thread:
**Re: Plea for IDL 2000 (was: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines)** - Index(es):