[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?

Subject: Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?
From: Karri Kaksonen <karri(at)twins.dna.fi>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 21:34:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Mgco4.1444$5Bf.180884992@news.telia.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Telia Finland Customer News Service
References: <87q5b0$g0k$1@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> <Mgco4.1444$5Bf.180884992@news.telia.no>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:18370


On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Roy E. Hansen wrote:

> In article <87q5b0$g0k$1@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>, "Richard Tyc" <richt@sbrc.umanitoba.ca> wrote:
> >IDL speed gurus:.
> 
> Hence, the 1D FFT is a factor of 2 slower in 5.3 than in 5.2.1

This sounds _very_ bad. Especially since they announced that this
was the last release for the Alpha processor running Windows NT.

It kind of takes away all the advantage of having a fast CPU in
the first place...
--
Karri

References:
- IDL 5.3 Performance ?
  - From: Richard Tyc
- Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?
  - From: Roy E. Hansen

Prev by Date: Re: Passing optional parameters through a wrapper routine
Next by Date: Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?
Prev by thread: Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?
Next by thread: Re: IDL 5.3 Performance ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread