[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: contour levels from IDL
In article <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com (David Fanning) writes:
|> H C Pumphrey (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
|> > [snip] you actually get between ndesired and 2*ndesired
|> > ; contours.
|> I fail to see how this is much of an improvement over
|> ncontours = nlevels + (more or less)
|> But certainly not TWO times more! :-)
It's the price you pay for getting to pick the range _and_ having nice round
numbers for the contour values.
(I think I was answering a point that was brought up halfway along the thread
not the original point at all)
Hugh C. Pumphrey | Telephone 0131-650-6026
Department of Meteorology | FAX 0131-650-5780
The University of Edinburgh | Replace 0131 with +44-131 if outside U.K.
EDINBURGH EH9 3JZ, Scotland | Email email@example.com
OBDisclaimer: The views expressed herein are mine, not those of UofE.