[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*Subject*: Correlation on log-log? -or- Easy way of removing 0's?*From*: Simon de Vet <simon(at)mathstat.dal.ca>*Date*: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:43:24 -0300*Newsgroups*: comp.lang.idl-pvwave*Organization*: ISINet, Nova Scotia*Xref*: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:19804

I have been creating scatter plots on a log-log graph, and they look pretty good. However, I'd like some more accuracy than saying "pretty good". I tried to use CORRELATE, and got some fairly reasonable values. However, since CORRELATE is working with the pure data, scatters that look good on the log-log plot can give some pretty horrendous correlation coefficients. Therefore, I thought I'd try doing a correlation of the log the data, to get a better impression of what I'm seeing. Of the five data sets, 2 gave better correlations, one got worse, and 2 gave me NaN's. I think that this may be because some of the values are 0, and this makes my computer explode (metaphorically speaking, of course). Is there an easy way of fixing this problem without loops? Could there be another cause of my problem? Thanks Simon

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Correlation on log-log? -or- Easy way of removing 0's?***From:*Craig Markwardt

- Prev by Date:
**Re: ICUR Library** - Next by Date:
**Re: Correlation on log-log? -or- Easy way of removing 0's?** - Prev by thread:
**Re: ICUR Library** - Next by thread:
**Re: Correlation on log-log? -or- Easy way of removing 0's?** - Index(es):