[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Philosophy of for loops

Subject: Re: Philosophy of for loops
From: Pavel Romashkin <promashkin(at)cmdl.noaa.gov>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:46:40 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: NOAA-CMDL-CIRES
References: <tclement-2808001429170001@checont6.ucsd.edu> <39AB72AE.B69E8019@dkrz.de> <8oh2a0$vt8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <onn1huybd3.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu> <8oln86$don$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Reply-To: promashkin(at)cmdl.noaa.gov
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:21223

> So does that mean that form (3) is slower than form (1)?

I am sure the speed difference would be much less than the time required
to find out by how much exactly :-(
Cheers,
Pavel

References:
- Philosophy of for loops
  - From: Todd Clements
- Re: Philosophy of for loops
  - From: landsman
- Re: Philosophy of for loops
  - From: Craig Markwardt

Prev by Date: Re: Gridding options
Next by Date: recursive functions?
Prev by thread: Re: Philosophy of for loops
Next by thread: Re: Philosophy of for loops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread