[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: idl5.4 and win2k

Subject: Re: idl5.4 and win2k
From: Jaco van Gorkom <j.c.van.gorkom(at)fz-juelich.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 13:48:27 +0100
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: FOM-Instituut voor Plasmafysica Rijnhuizen
References: <3A9B9BBA.81BED29E@fz-juelich.de> <3A9BA0A2.1F175560@fz-juelich.de> <et4n6.1438$sT1.233434@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3A9D2BC8.92FD09DC@fz-juelich.de> <3A9EB8B4.441C6944@Risoe.Dk>
Reply-To: j.c.van.gorkom(at)fz-juelich.de
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:23818

> > Martin Downing wrote:
> > > PS: what's CREASO - is it to do with ironing?
> >
> Reimar Bauer wrote:
> > No - it's the european  distributor for IDL.
> 
Kristian Kjaer wrote:
> More precisely, the IDL distributor for the German part of Europe?

You just wait there in Denmark:-) They (CREASO) already conquered The
Netherlands a few years back. They are friendly enough, though - see the
original thread.
  Jaco van Gorkom
  FOM-Instituut voor Plasmafysica Rijnhuizen, The Netherlands.

References:
- idl5.4 and win2k
  - From: Reimar Bauer
- Re: idl5.4 and win2k
  - From: Reimar Bauer
- Re: idl5.4 and win2k
  - From: Martin Downing
- Re: idl5.4 and win2k
  - From: Reimar Bauer
- Re: idl5.4 and win2k
  - From: Kristian Kjaer

Prev by Date: Re: JULDAY 5.4 not same as 5.3?
Next by Date: digital grain size analysis
Prev by thread: Re: idl5.4 and win2k
Next by thread: Frustrating array in structure. Please help
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread