[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: User selectable lower array bound?

Subject: Re: User selectable lower array bound?
From: david(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 07:51:45 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
References: <3B69CA57.FD3B1D8D@noaa.gov> <9kcskl$nen$1@news.orst.edu> <Pine.GHP.4.32.0108090206390.17502-100000@icesat2.gsfc.nasa.gov> <3B728D02.6D23AD6C@noaa.gov>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:26105

Paul van Delst writes:
 
> Having said all that I still think IDL is one of the much better things that have come to
> pass since sliced bread. :oD  I'd be lost without it.

Better to put this at the *top* of the rant,
if you want the good folks at RSI to pay 
attention. :-)

Cheers,

David

-- 
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Follow-Ups:
- Re: User selectable lower array bound?
  - From: Paul van Delst

References:
- User selectable lower array bound?
  - From: Paul van Delst
- Re: User selectable lower array bound?
  - From: bennetsc
- Re: User selectable lower array bound?
  - From: Jeff Guerber
- Re: User selectable lower array bound?
  - From: Paul van Delst

Prev by Date: Re: User selectable lower array bound?
Next by Date: Re: User selectable lower array bound?
Prev by thread: Re: User selectable lower array bound?
Next by thread: Re: User selectable lower array bound?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread