[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Medical Imaging Question
- Subject: Re: Medical Imaging Question
- From: David Fenyes <dfenyes(at)flash.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 02:13:10 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: @Home Network
- References: <MPG.12134dfd2c8c96a7989871@news.frii.com>
- Sender: dave(at)c34680-a.grlnd1.tx.home.com
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:16097
Hello David,
1) Of course you can physically do this. One way is to find or build
a special CRT (or any other technology) that can display that kind
of greyscale. Of course you can dither the image in magnification,
then opticaly (or neuronally) blur. Alternatively, change each
pixel into an exposure time (meaning the pixel is on for
e.g. 0-4.095 seconds), then expose a film in a dark room (or find a
souped up laser filmer). Develop and place against a lightbox in a
dark room to appreciate. Or write software to time average on the
retina (like the HP48 calculator greyscale programs do).
2) Of course, you probably don't really want to do this.
Radiologists, especially mammographers and chest radiologists, are
famous for wanting all the dynamic range. However, they like to
sit in total darkness, and often use blinders. Even so, they often
use the hotlight, or have the tech expose to get the object of
interest in their visual sweet spot. In otherwords, having all the
dynamic range there on the film doesn't free you from physically
windowing and leveling to see your object of interest.
For digital images such as CT, images are routinely printed
with several window/level settings to look at bone, solid organs,
excreting kidneys, brain, etc. On the scanner, they are constantly
playing with the settings. This is no handicap. Like the
lightboxes and the exposure settings for plain film, it's a natural
way of making sure the important pathology patterns register on the
neural networks in the retina and occipital lobe.
3) Naturally, you still want to keep the numerical image as accurate
as possible while window/level mapping it onto the more practical
256 levels. That way, if you perform any computations on the
image, you have all the precision. Computers don't suffer from the
perception limitations that humans do :-)
Regards,
David
--
David Fenyes -- dfenyes@home.com