[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDL 5.3 serious problem: save files sneakily restored
Martin Schultz (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
> This is at least contrary to the online help of 5.3:
Well, who ya gonna believe? Me or the on-line help? :-)
> So, at least theoretically, pro should get executed before sav.
> And this makes all the sense in the world, because otherwise it
> would be hard for authors of compiled files to develop them -
> they would have to delete the sav file each time they modify the
> pro file and want to test changes.
I can't understand how the pro should be executed before
the sav, even theoretically. How would the sav file *ever*
get executed unless it is the *first* once checked?
And it is not problem *testing* changed routines. Just
compile them. IDL *always* looks in memory first, sav
file second, and pro file third.
But I think you *do* have to delete the sav file
if you want the changed file to be found *automatically*.
Although I'm too busy right now to test it. I'm going
to leave that to Ben, since this is certainly an exam
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: email@example.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155