Re: Many procedures, what to do?

[Craig Markwardt <craigmnet(at)cow.physics.wisc.edu>]

Hmm, that would be nice, but can that work on IDL < 5.3?

Not-living-in-the-here-and-now-when-it-comes-to-IDL-versions Craig

"Pavel A. Romashkin" <pavel.romashkin@noaa.gov> writes:

> How about using compile_opt, strictarr? It will eliminate the need for
> forward_function. I use it all the time and have no worries about IDL
> mixing functions with arrays. This way, the caller does not need
> compiled library functions to know they are functions - the syntax of
> the call implies that they are, and will be available at the execution time.
> 
> Cheers,
> Pavel

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D.         EMAIL:    craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------