[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: something like perl's 'require 5.4'
Craig Markwardt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>Vapuser <email@example.com> writes:
>> How about:
>> if version lt input_version then 'eeek'
>> Clearly `desired_release' would have to be input as a string.
>> Of couse, this method 'requires' IDL 5.3 (IIRC), to get the regular
>> expression semantics of strsplit. The other question is will RSI use
>> any separator in version designations besides these three?
>Umm, I never thought I'd be saying this, but aren't these a bit
>overengineered? I have found that in 95% of the cases the DOUBLE
>compare will work, and in 4% of the cases the STRING compare will
I've always found that a simple string comparison works in 100% of the cases.
Where doesn't it work?