[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Am I stupid?

Subject: Re: Am I stupid?
From: Bill <wclodius(at)lanl.gov>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:14:01 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: University of Oregon
References: <9if00h$li7$1@readme.uio.no> <3B4B08DA.D3A9986A@ssec-nospam.wisc.edu> <onn16cvpe1.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu> <3B4B1DF2.D147C287@fz-juelich.de> <3B4B2F53.80830E4@noaa.gov> <3B4C3462.958BB689@fz-juelich.de> <3B4C60E8.22A6D3A5@noaa.gov> <3B4C835A.FC0AF723@wizard.net> <3B4C9619.820D820C@noaa.gov>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:25642

A better way to describe what could, but is not, implemented for IDL's keywords is a multise
stage process

1. If a keyword on an invocation exactly matches a keyword in the functions's definition then it
is that keyword, else

2. if the  keyord on invocation is an abbreviation for exactly one keyword in the functions's
definitition then it is that keyword, else

3. It is an error that can be determined statically.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Paul van Delst

References:
- Am I stupid?
  - From: Colin Rosenthal
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Liam E. Gumley
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Jaco van Gorkom
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Jaco van Gorkom
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: James Kuyper
- Re: Am I stupid?
  - From: Paul van Delst

Prev by Date: Re: Am I stupid?
Next by Date: Re: Am I stupid?
Prev by thread: Re: Am I stupid?
Next by thread: Re: Am I stupid?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread