[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IDL and Beowolf ?

Subject: Re: IDL and Beowolf ?
From: Craig Markwardt <craigmnet(at)cow.physics.wisc.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 2001 21:10:41 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: U. Wisc. Madison Physics -- Compact Objects
References: <GGxou8.KBJ.A.ebony@news.trentu.ca> <onbsmbwipf.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu> <MPG.15c62e7515c15a95989e3a@news.frii.com>
Reply-To: craigmnet(at)cow.physics.wisc.edu
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:25797


david@dfanning.com (David Fanning) writes:
> Time to upgrade from IDL 4.0, Craig? :-)

I already use IDL 5.2 and 5.3, thank you very much. :-) I stick with
the old notation and avoid new features, because "why break what's
already fixed?"

Craig


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D.         EMAIL:    craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- IDL and Beowolf ?
  - From: dmarshall
- Re: IDL and Beowolf ?
  - From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: IDL and Beowolf ?
  - From: David Fanning

Prev by Date: Re: IDL license file
Next by Date: Re: FFT in a 2D variable in only one direction
Prev by thread: Re: IDL and Beowolf ?
Next by thread: Re: IDL and Beowolf ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread