[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: histogram question
"Bill B." <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> > how can you turn the former into the latter without a loop? This is
> > somewhat similar to Pavel's running chunk index problem earlier in the
> > year. Finding an answer is not trivial. It would apply directly to
> > this problem, where the pairs are adjacent elements in the reverse
> > indices vector. Any takers?
> I've encountered a few areas where certain logic problems cannot be
> solved without a loop in IDL. Usually, this always points to the fact
> that there are certain IDL functions that (logically) insist upon
> scalar parameters.
> -Bill B.
Okay, here's an effort using two histograms instead of one, just to
get some interest going. No visible loops, but not the sort of
stuff you put in production code. With this as a head start, let's
see the single-histogram approach.
A = [-1,3,7,12,15,18,20,20] ;The solution must work with negative and
NPair = N_Elements(A)/2
MaxA = Max(A, Min = MinA)
D = MaxA - MinA
P = Lindgen(NPair)*2
H1 = Histogram(A[P], Max = MaxA, Min = MinA, R = R1)
H2 = Histogram(A[P + 1], Max = MaxA, Min = MinA, R = R2)
x1 = (R1 - MaxA)[0:D]
x2 = (R2 - MaxA)[0:D]
C = [A, ((x1 ne x2)*(Lindgen(D + 1) + MinA) > MinA) < MaxA]
C = C[Sort(C)]
C = C[Uniq(C)]
; Loop version
B = Indgen(NPair)*2
For I = 0L, NPair - 1 Do Print, A[B[I]] + Lindgen(A[B[I] + 1]- A[B[I]] + 1)
Extra credit for minimal use of "" notation.