[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RSI's Priorities (was: GUI Builder...)

Subject: Re: RSI's Priorities (was: GUI Builder...)
From: rosentha(at)asp.hao.ucar.edu (Colin Rosenthal)
Date: 17 Nov 1998 21:53:17 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: High Altitude Observatory/NCAR, Boulder CO
References: <3648AEE6.2332@bial1.ucsd.edu> <3649D657.DA17EE93@cdc.noaa.gov> <72igcn$a7s@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Reply-To: rosentha(at)hao.SNIPME.ucar.edu
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:12835

On Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:47:32 -0700, 
Brian Jackel <jackel@danlon.physics.uwo.ca> wrote:

>New bells and whistles at $1500 a pop or
>Freeze development and deliver an ``IDL Classic'' at
>$500 per head.
>
>My vote would certainly be for the second option.

Personally I'd vote for better numerical routines as my highest priority,
but we all have different ideas on what we'd really like IDL to do.

-- 
Colin Rosenthal
High Altitude Observatory
Boulder, Colorado
rosentha@hao.ucar.edu

References:
- GUI Builder limited to Windows platform (LONG)
  - From: David Foster
- RSI's Priorities (was: GUI Builder...)
  - From: Andy Loughe
- Re: RSI's Priorities (was: GUI Builder...)
  - From: Brian Jackel

Prev by Date: Re: No, no, not again!
Next by Date: Re: Dumb Dumb Question
Prev by thread: Re: RSI's Priorities (was: GUI Builder...)
Next by thread: Re: GUI Builder limited to Windows platform (LONG)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread