[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vn5.4 woes (today missing)
"Mark Hadfield" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> <email@example.com> wrote in message firstname.lastname@example.org">news:email@example.com...
> > David Fanning <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > >I thought all those date/time structures went away in IDL 5.2
> > >because they could not be made Y2K compatible. You must still
> > >be working on that data archive, William. :-)
> > Hmmf, this is in fact working on climate model data, which ran past
> > 2300 well before y2k came. And it seems to work still, once the right
> > are copied into place.
> The lack of Y2K conpatibility lay in the fact that ONE of the routines (I
> forget the name)
str_to_dt.pro, I believe.
> would accept 2-digit years and do something not very smart
> with them. The routine also accepted 4-digit years so people prescient
> enough to use them would never have noticed a problem.
> Pulling the IDLDT stuff was a lawyer-driven panic.
I agree. I pulled them out of idl 5.2 and use them daily in all of
my processing at work. If you use 4 digits, there's *absolutely* no
Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog it's too dark to read